Critical Theory and International Relations: A Reader Steven C. Roach
Material type: TextLanguage: Eng. Publication details: Routledge 2009 New YorkEdition: 1st edDescription: xxv, 398 p. ; 26 cmISBN:- 9780415954198
- 327.101 ROA
Item type | Current library | Call number | Materials specified | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Books | Rashtriya Raksha University | 327.101 ROA (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 01 | Available | 11055 | |||
Books | Rashtriya Raksha University | 327.101 ROA (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 02 | Available | 11056 | |||
Books | Rashtriya Raksha University | 327.101 ROA (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 03 | In transit from Rashtriya Raksha University to Rashtriya Raksha University since 10/01/2024 | 11057 |
Browsing Rashtriya Raksha University shelves Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
327.101 MEA The Tragedy of Great Power Politics | 327.101 ROA Critical Theory and International Relations: A Reader | 327.101 ROA Critical Theory and International Relations: A Reader | 327.101 ROA Critical Theory and International Relations: A Reader | 327.101 SCH Theories of International Relations | 327.101 SHA Introducing International Relations | 327.101 SHA Introducing International Relations |
This innovative new Reader provides students, scholars, and practitioners with a comprehensive overview of essential works of critical theory and critical international relations (IR) theory, including the writings of Kant, Hegel, Marx, Nietzsche, Freud, Weber, Horkheimer, Adorno, Marcuse, Habermas, Linklater, and Honneth, among others.
Steven Roach frames each chapter showing the major tensions of four periods of the extension of critical theory into critical IR theory. This rich narrative, telling the story of how critical theory entered into international relations theory, seeks to deepen the reader's historical and sociological understanding of the emancipatory project of critical IR theory. Postmodernist and feminist texts are included to give context to the question of whether the discipline is in crisis or is working toward a cohesive and reflexive framework.
There are no comments on this title.