The International Court of Justice and Maritime Disputes: The Case of Chile and Peru (Record no. 5045)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02426nam a2200229Ia 4500
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field RRU
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20231003121838.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 210901s2019 ||||||||| ||||||| 0|eng|d
020 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD BOOK NUMBER
ISBN 9781138343320
Printed Price Rs. 4675.00
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Original cataloging agency RRU
Language of cataloging English
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title Eng.
082 ## - DEWEY DECIMAL CLASSIFICATION NUMBER
Class No. 341.448091641
Item number FAU
100 ## - FIRST AUTHOR (IF A PERSON)
9 (RLIN) 1759
Name of author Faundez, Julio
245 #4 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title The International Court of Justice and Maritime Disputes: The Case of Chile and Peru
Statement of responsibility Julio Faundez
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. Routledge
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2019
Place of publication, distribution, etc. New York
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
No. of pages xiv, 109 p.
Other physical details ; 23 cm.
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. The origins of the maritime dispute between Chile and Peru go back to 1952, when these countries, along with Ecuador, asserted sovereignty over 200 nautical miles from their coasts. This maritime claim is widely regarded as one of the most important contributions by a group of developing countries to the law of the sea. Peru then asked the Court of International Justice to delimit its lateral boundary with Chile in accordance with principles of international law. Chile asked the Court to dismiss the request. The question before the ICJ Justice was whether the treaty concluded by the parties when they made their claim had also delimited their lateral boundary.<br/><br/>This book provides a critical analysis of the approach to treaty interpretation by the International Court of Justice in Maritime Disputes. Focusing on the case of Chile and Peru, the book explores two main issues: the interpretation of the Santiago Declaration and its connected treaties; and the tacit agreement that established a lateral maritime boundary with a seaward extension of 80 nautical miles. Part I argues that the Court’s finding that the Santiago Declaration did not delimit the lateral boundary is mistaken because it ignores its context, as well as its object and purpose. Part II argues that the finding that the parties had entered into a tacit agreement is an unjustified legal inference derived from a hasty interpretation of the Special Agreement of 1954. It questions that the reliability of the evidence used to determine the seaward extent of the lateral boundary and argues that the Court failed to demonstrate the bearing of contemporaneous developments in the law of the sea on the content of the tacit agreement.
650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Subject heading International Court of Justice
9 (RLIN) 1760
650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Subject heading Maritime boundaries
9 (RLIN) 1761
650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Subject heading Treaties--Interpretation and construction
9 (RLIN) 1762
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Source of classification or shelving scheme Dewey Decimal Classification
Koha item type Books
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan (e.g. reference copy) Home library Current library Date acquired Inventory number Total Checkouts Full call number Accession No Date last seen Date last checked out Item MRP (printed price) Price effective from Koha item type
    Dewey Decimal Classification     Rashtriya Raksha University Rashtriya Raksha University 02/11/2020 08054 4 387.16 FAU 8054 18/09/2023 18/09/2023 4675.00 02/09/2021 Books
© 2024 Rashtriya Raksha University, All Rights Reserved.